Comments on: ASP.Net MVC Book Review and musings http://blog.codehangover.com/asp-net-mvc-musings-and-book-review/ Go ahead, have another Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:42:38 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: ASP.Net MVC Book Review and Musings http://blog.codehangover.com/asp-net-mvc-musings-and-book-review/#comment-97 ASP.Net MVC Book Review and Musings Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:13:06 +0000 http://blog.codehangover.com/?p=307#comment-97 [...] ASP.Net MVC Book Review and Musings http://blog.codehangover.com/asp-net-mvc-musings-and-book-review/ [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('97','ASP.Net MVC Book Review and Musings'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('97','ASP.Net MVC Book Review and Musings','[...] ASP.Net MVC Book Review and Musings http:\/\/blog.codehangover.com\/asp-net-mvc-musings-and-book-review\/ [...]'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] ASP.Net MVC Book Review and Musings http://blog.codehangover.com/asp-net-mvc-musings-and-book-review/ [...]
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Welzie http://blog.codehangover.com/asp-net-mvc-musings-and-book-review/#comment-87 Welzie Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:41:24 +0000 http://blog.codehangover.com/?p=307#comment-87 <a href='#comment-84' rel="nofollow">@Paul Batum</a> - Point taken. Updated review accordingly. I have also updated my cons to note the fact that LINQ to SQL was used for brevity. The book really does have in depth examples, so I guess keeping them shorter but still on point was a good choice. I'm just not a big fan of LINQ to SQL.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('87','Welzie'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('87','Welzie','<a href=\'#comment-84\' rel=\"nofollow\">@Paul Batum<\/a> - Point taken. Updated review accordingly. I have also updated my cons to note the fact that LINQ to SQL was used for brevity. The book really does have in depth examples, so I guess keeping them shorter but still on point was a good choice. I\'m just not a big fan of LINQ to SQL.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> @Paul Batum – Point taken. Updated review accordingly. I have also updated my cons to note the fact that LINQ to SQL was used for brevity. The book really does have in depth examples, so I guess keeping them shorter but still on point was a good choice. I’m just not a big fan of LINQ to SQL.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Paul Batum http://blog.codehangover.com/asp-net-mvc-musings-and-book-review/#comment-84 Paul Batum Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:24:30 +0000 http://blog.codehangover.com/?p=307#comment-84 Ahh, so perhaps your con should read "Database examples using LINQ to SQL". LINQ and LINQ to SQL are different things.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('84','Paul Batum'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('84','Paul Batum','Ahh, so perhaps your con should read \"Database examples using LINQ to SQL\". LINQ and LINQ to SQL are different things.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> Ahh, so perhaps your con should read “Database examples using LINQ to SQL”. LINQ and LINQ to SQL are different things.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: ASP.Net MVC musings and book review : Code Hangover | Review Gallery http://blog.codehangover.com/asp-net-mvc-musings-and-book-review/#comment-83 ASP.Net MVC musings and book review : Code Hangover | Review Gallery Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:54:54 +0000 http://blog.codehangover.com/?p=307#comment-83 [...] View post: ASP.Net MVC musings and bo&#11... [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('83','ASP.Net MVC musings and book review : Code Hangover | Review Gallery'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('83','ASP.Net MVC musings and book review : Code Hangover | Review Gallery','[...] View post: ASP.Net MVC musings and bo&#11... [...]'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] View post: ASP.Net MVC musings and bo&#11… [...]
Reply – Quote
]]> By: ASP.Net MVC musings and book review : Code Hangover | Webmaster Tools http://blog.codehangover.com/asp-net-mvc-musings-and-book-review/#comment-82 ASP.Net MVC musings and book review : Code Hangover | Webmaster Tools Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:23:08 +0000 http://blog.codehangover.com/?p=307#comment-82 [...] Here is the original post: ASP.Net MVC musings and book review : Code Hangover [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('82','ASP.Net MVC musings and book review : Code Hangover | Webmaster Tools'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('82','ASP.Net MVC musings and book review : Code Hangover | Webmaster Tools','[...] Here is the original post: ASP.Net MVC musings and book review : Code Hangover [...]'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] Here is the original post: ASP.Net MVC musings and book review : Code Hangover [...]
Reply – Quote
]]> By: MikeNereson http://blog.codehangover.com/asp-net-mvc-musings-and-book-review/#comment-81 MikeNereson Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:02:34 +0000 http://blog.codehangover.com/?p=307#comment-81 He wrote this post and said in it that he was writing it from the point of view of a "Java, PHP, and .Net developer" So I can see why as a polyglot programmer he would not be a fan of using LINQ, not that LINQ is not a valid choice.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('81','MikeNereson'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('81','MikeNereson','He wrote this post and said in it that he was writing it from the point of view of a \"Java, PHP, and .Net developer\" So I can see why as a polyglot programmer he would not be a fan of using LINQ, not that LINQ is not a valid choice.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> He wrote this post and said in it that he was writing it from the point of view of a “Java, PHP, and .Net developer” So I can see why as a polyglot programmer he would not be a fan of using LINQ, not that LINQ is not a valid choice.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Welzie http://blog.codehangover.com/asp-net-mvc-musings-and-book-review/#comment-80 Welzie Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:04:34 +0000 http://blog.codehangover.com/?p=307#comment-80 <a href='#comment-79' rel="nofollow">@Chocolim</a> - The book covers a wide range of topics and IMHO not mentioning the mono project is a con. Especially since ASP.Net MVC is likely to attract developers that are used to open platforms such as the mono project. Also the book isn't a LINQ book, so why only feature LINQ? And IMHO NHibernate is the way to go, but that is a debate for another day.<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('80','Welzie'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('80','Welzie','<a href=\'#comment-79\' rel=\"nofollow\">@Chocolim<\/a> - The book covers a wide range of topics and IMHO not mentioning the mono project is a con. Especially since ASP.Net MVC is likely to attract developers that are used to open platforms such as the mono project. Also the book isn\'t a LINQ book, so why only feature LINQ? And IMHO NHibernate is the way to go, but that is a debate for another day.'); return false;">Quote</a></div> @Chocolim – The book covers a wide range of topics and IMHO not mentioning the mono project is a con. Especially since ASP.Net MVC is likely to attract developers that are used to open platforms such as the mono project. Also the book isn’t a LINQ book, so why only feature LINQ? And IMHO NHibernate is the way to go, but that is a debate for another day.
Reply – Quote
]]> By: Chocolim http://blog.codehangover.com/asp-net-mvc-musings-and-book-review/#comment-79 Chocolim Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:52:39 +0000 http://blog.codehangover.com/?p=307#comment-79 The first 2 Cons arent really Cons. Linq is the way to go. And the book isnt about mono is about MS asp.net mvc<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('79','Chocolim'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('79','Chocolim','The first 2 Cons arent really Cons. Linq is the way to go. And the book isnt about mono is about MS asp.net mvc'); return false;">Quote</a></div> The first 2 Cons arent really Cons. Linq is the way to go. And the book isnt about mono is about MS asp.net mvc
Reply – Quote
]]>